2000 · Mandeni council results
Mathunzi, KwaZulu-Natal
IFP leads the vote
Council seats
Seat allocation unavailable.The vote breakdown is below.
Combined ballot votes
Combined ballot votes
Other: show remaining parties: hide remaining parties0.2%74 votes
| Party / entry | Candidate | Votes | Vote share (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | — | 23 852 | 57,243 |
| AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | — | 15 436 | 37,0452 |
| DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE | — | 1 817 | 4,3607 |
| AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY | — | 293 | 0,7032 |
| UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT | — | 196 | 0,4704 |
| INDEPENDENTS | — | 74 | 0,1776 |
| UBUMBANO LWESIZWE INDEPENDENT RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION | — | 0 | 0 |
41668 valid votes. Shares use this ballot’s party totals. All published entries are included.
How the vote changed
Ward + municipal PR votes by election
Swipe to see history
| Election | Party | Votes | Vote share (%) | Valid ballot total | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 23 852 | 57,243 | 41 668 | Reported |
| 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 15 436 | 37,0452 | 41 668 | Reported |
| 2 000 | DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE | 1 817 | 4,3607 | 41 668 | Reported |
| 2 000 | AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY | 293 | 0,7032 | 41 668 | Reported |
| 2 000 | UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT | 196 | 0,4704 | 41 668 | Reported |
| 2 000 | UBUMBANO LWESIZWE INDEPENDENT RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION | 0 | 0 | 41 668 | Reported |
Ward + municipal PR votes. Missing and grouped entries are not assumed to be zero. Published boundaries may differ between elections.
History data & sources
Ward + municipal PR votes. Connecting bands show the same party’s share or seats between elections, not individual voters moving between parties. Select a year to inspect its values; use the election-year selector to explore its results and places.
The chart names the five largest parties across these elections. The vote list also names parties gaining at least 2 percentage points since the previous election; remaining votes are combined under Other. Other’s change compares the same group of parties in both elections. Missing values remain unavailable.
- All points use the same ballot basis. Ballot totals are not counts of individual voters.
- Missing or grouped party rows remain gaps unless a complete, ungrouped list establishes zero votes.
- Municipal boundaries can change between elections. Published area results are not boundary-adjusted.
Ward results
Browse wardsWards in Mandeni
16 wards
| Ward | Election | Party / entry | Votes | Vote share (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 1 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 3 197 | 76,0828 |
| Ward 1 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 931 | 22,1561 |
| Ward 2 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 2 251 | 64,3327 |
| Ward 2 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 1 186 | 33,8954 |
| Ward 3 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 1 148 | 35,2905 |
| Ward 3 | 2 000 | DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE | 1 010 | 31,0483 |
| Ward 4 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 1 946 | 83,627 |
| Ward 4 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 206 | 8,8526 |
| Ward 5 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 1 318 | 70,2933 |
| Ward 5 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 455 | 24,2667 |
| Ward 6 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 2 547 | 67,4523 |
| Ward 6 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 1 069 | 28,3104 |
| Ward 7 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 1 290 | 68,2179 |
| Ward 7 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 571 | 30,1957 |
| Ward 8 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 3 626 | 87,1006 |
| Ward 8 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 503 | 12,0826 |
| Ward 9 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 2 124 | 74,9471 |
| Ward 9 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 658 | 23,2181 |
| Ward 10 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 460 | 50,5495 |
| Ward 10 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 417 | 45,8242 |
| Ward 11 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 987 | 75,8647 |
| Ward 11 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 206 | 15,834 |
| Ward 12 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 2 173 | 70,142 |
| Ward 12 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 760 | 24,532 |
| Ward 13 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 796 | 50 |
| Ward 13 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 718 | 45,1005 |
| Ward 14 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 977 | 50,8854 |
| Ward 14 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 900 | 46,875 |
| Ward 15 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 1 251 | 54,4861 |
| Ward 15 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 1 009 | 43,946 |
| Ward 16 | 2 000 | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 2 086 | 76,3823 |
| Ward 16 | 2 000 | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 602 | 22,0432 |
The two largest published entries shown on each ward card. Open a ward for all entries.
Sources & result details
IEC: 25 Oct 2021, 14:56 SAST · checked 05 Nov 2026, 15:59 SAST
Historical comparisons use published area results. Boundaries may change between elections. Vote shares use the ballot labelled on each chart; ballots are not individual voters.
Vote percentages beside council seats combine ward and municipal PR ballots. Seat counts include both ward and PR councillors.
Ward vs PR ballots
Ward: choose a person. PR: choose a party.
The candidate with the most votes in the whole ward wins one seat. They do not need more than 50%.
PR means proportional representation. Party-list seats balance the council’s overall party representation.
Party ward votes and municipal PR votes both count towards the party’s overall seat allocation.
Outside metros, voters also have a separate district PR ballot. An independent can stand in a ward but not on a party PR list.
IEC guide to council seatsThe council results cover all of Mandeni. Ward results include areas outside Mathunzi.
This page uses the Stats SA statistical main-place boundary labelled 2016. It overlaps 1 of the 2026 wards; the everyday town boundary may differ.
Town-to-ward mappings are available for 2026 only. The historical wards above belong to the whole municipality in 2000.
Positive-area intersections of the full-precision 2016 Stats SA main-place polygon and the MDB 2026 ward polygons. Display simplification is applied separately. Full-ward figures include votes outside the place; votes are never allocated by overlap area. Small boundary alignment differences were excluded using a 10-metre precision tolerance, a combined foreign area below 0.01% of the place, and agreement with the source municipality.